Early in 2012 I visited a Jesuit community in which I was
once a member. One new member asked what ministry I am pursuing. Explaining
that I worked with college-age seminarians, I sensed a fog suddenly descending
over the conversation. After a second, as the Jesuit took another sip of his
cocktail, I was asked, “How conservative are they?”
This was not the first time I was asked such a question in
response to my naming my ministry. And not just by Jesuits. There are many
middle-age and older clergy who are fearful of the assumed outlook of most
seminarians today. The ‘conservative vs. liberal’ conversation about the
attitudes of seminarians, priests, bishops, or anyone else does not intrigue me.
To oversimplify it, clergy of my generation think many, if not most, of today’s
seminarians want to return the Church to its pre-Vatican II status. If that is
true, then I wonder how it will be done, since none of today’s seminarians even
remotely experienced life before Vatican II.
Vatican II is the red line. For many clergy today,
everything before it was bad. Everything that immediately followed it was good.
In other words, value judgments have been laid out blanketing any sensible
dialogue. My OED defines the word ‘conservative’ as “characterized by a
tendency to preserve or keep intact or unchanged.”
The word liberal is a little more complex. It comes from
Latin meaning ‘pertaining to a free man.’ The word originally meant ‘the
distinctive epithet of those ‘arts’ or ‘sciences’ that were considered ‘worthy
of a free man.’ Its secondary meaning is ‘free in bestowing; bountiful,
generous, open-hearted.’ It further means ‘free from restraint; free in speech
or action; free from narrow prejudice, open-minded, candid.’
Both words suffer connotations that give them negative implications.
Both apply to politics but they are also used in Church environments as well.
And each age views them differently. History, once lived, lets the deeper
senses emerge.
Seminarians are at one and the same time conservative and
liberal, progressive and traditional. The best of them are well-rounded in
their views. The worry is that some are very rigid in their views. The best are
open-minded and willing to learn. Most seminarians I know are much more
conservative than I was when I was one of them. But they are not easy to label.
Many of them also have a much greater openness to God and spirituality and
ministry than I ever remember in the seminary.
The bottom line for me is that these young men seek
holiness; they are eager and enthusiastic; they want to serve. They are also
novices on the road to the priesthood. They are not finished products. The
rigid ones – and I’ve only met enough to count on one hand – do not last. If
they do, they tend to isolate themselves from everyone else, including the
institutional Church. I am not as unhopeful about the future of priestly
ministry as some others are.
No comments:
Post a Comment